Thursday, May 13, 2004
Herald goes feral
I could almost start to enjoy The Herald, if they keep this sort of thing up;
Foreign Affairs officials are said to be upset by the Government's use of the report of Dr Brash's meeting. So they should be. They have every right to expect that reports written on a classified basis will not be used for cheap political gain. In one swoop, Helen Clark has soiled an important tool of their trade. No matter how great the temptation for a Government on the backfoot, it had to be resisted. A Prime Minister should never put a party's interests ahead of principle.Helen's halo has well and truly slipped, her judgement has been shot to ribbons and even the lefty media are looking on her with a critical eye. To my mind, Helen has been quite consistently arrogant, painfully dismissive when trouble shooting and snide to her detractors, but with the halo at half mast, it is only now she is being properly exposed. Long may it continue.
Monday, May 10, 2004
Cry me a river
Phil Harrington is a bag boy for Helen and he won't hear a bad word said against her. Read this if you think you can stomach some lefty righteous indignation in response to someone else's indignation.
Phil Harrington: Indignation from 'ardent supporter' a cheap shot
Ye Gods - good sense from The Herald
A good editorial in The Herald today - one can only hope it makes its way to Level 9. The highlight was pointing out Labour's obsession with tinkering and redistribution - totally unnecessary. What odds of the Government listening? Zero sadly.
When the Government is raking in $7.4 billion more than it needs it is time to look at tax reductions more generally. The promised relief in the coming Budget for low- and middle-income earners could, and should, take the form of income tax cuts, except that this Government seems to have a philosophical objection to them. It prefers to reimburse taxpayers through benefits and public service spending, which keeps state servants employed and wastes money on the way around.
Wednesday, May 05, 2004
Hoping for the best might be a tad optimistic
Let's just hope we don't get the worst. Hikoi time, and Jonathan Hunt has already, and quite rightly, declared Parliaments steps off limits.
If today goes off without major incident, other than being well surprised, My Right will also be very pleased. There is enough heat in this debate already without one or two seasoned activists (or haters and wreckers as Helen baited them - nice one) pouring petrol over it.
Tuesday, May 04, 2004
Missed the point, or just a different focus?
Michael at No Right Turn believes that I have missed the point. I may have taken a different angle on his 'if you can't feed'em - don't have'em' post - but I don't believe that blaming the student loan system (of which I am currently a significant contributor to) is enough.
My point is, the student loan fund is made up of Government borrowing from overseas, the $7 billion can not just be written off. So where to from here? I paid for my education to the tune of $38,000 and am now paying it back. I would accept that, if every other area of my life was not being overwhelmed by taxes.
The incentive to earn more, more particularly, to stay in NZ and earn more is dramatically reduced when only half of the increased earnings find their way into the bank account - this is true. But is the student loan 10% the crux of the issue? Take the SST article and eliminate the student loan from the equation - that same scenario improves by circa $100 per week, still not a lot of slack when the Government is grabbing a little more here and even more there.
I will post some of today's Q & (no) A from Parliament later to highlight this argument. In the meantime I would espouse that the fairest change to the student loan scheme would be to freeze any increase to the total loan balance once a person is paying back 10% of their wages, but not paying back enough to cover the interest charges themselves. To be paying back what you are obliged to when working full time as a graduate (as is the intention of the scheme) and watching the total loan balance climb steadily is indeed soul destroying.
Monday, May 03, 2004
Death of the middle class? Solution: stop them from being born
Michael at No Right Turn has added an optimistic commentary on the solution to the fall of the middle class. Apparently these people should not have breed in the first place.
Although Idiot is bang on in his analysis of the predicament that the middle class find themselves in, the "struggling middle class family" in question's problems are largely of their own making. At the end of the day they chose to have children that they couldn't afford...its no use whinging to Helen Clarke about it.So if a family earning slightly less than the average household income are limited to less than four children, where does that leave us? Three, two, 2.4 if you earn $70,000 plus??
Perhaps we should have to apply to the Government, mortgage style, before having kids? Simplistic bollocks Mikey boy, and for a thinker such as yourself, could you not address the issue at root cause and acknowledge that there is enough wealth to be had in the world to allow New Zealand to return to the quarter acre pavalova paradise scenario we once treasured. Don't get me started on the number of families on benefits that are encouraged to have kids for additional government 'support'.
This argument clearly defines the difference between self determination on a personal level (less Government interference - and tax) and vote winning populism (unsustainable and tax heavy). If that is the difference between left and right then I am not ambidextrous.
Not to mention the fact that one of biggest problems facing the country at the moment is the fact that we can barely afford to support the aging population - then where does this sort of thinking leave us? Start saving Mike, and when you find a wife - get used to cold showers...
Sunday, May 02, 2004
To die with dignity, not for someone else's crusade
To enter the Lesley Martin debate is to enter delicate and emotional territory, and for My Right, very personal territory. For those reasons there has been no posting on this topic to date. However it was question marks raised over the care provided by the Wanganui Hospice that finally convinced me to do so.
Let me start by saying that I have complete sympathy and understanding of Lesley Martin went through. A terminal illness is a tragic thing that can rip a heart and mind apart, and this may explain some of the actions of Lesley Martin, however the following extract disturbs me greatly;
She elected not to have treatment and to be nursed by her daughter, an experienced intensive care nurse, so she could die at home.The parallels to My Right's situation, involving the same Hospice, are many. When it became clear that Dad's cancer was in the final stages of robbing us all of him, and his situation got to the point where he was clearly distressed and it was so painful that he no longer wanted to fight, My Right's family was called together. That to me is one key difference - there was no autonomous decision making over the life of a dearly loved family member. My family made the hardest decision imaginable, together, supporting each other. Having two nurses in the family, we too were allowed to take dad home, knowing what that would mean.
In her book, To Die Like a Dog, Lesley Martin described how her mother asked her: "Don't let me lie there, not alive and not dead ... Please help me ... Be quick."
In the book, written as a screenplay, Martin quotes herself as saying: "I'll know ... I'll know when it's time ... I won't leave you like that ... I promise."
Hospice nurse Wiki Alward told the jury that Martin told her she gave her mother 60mg of morphine on the night of May 26-27, 1999.
Mrs Alward said Martin told her the morphine was not because her mother had increased pain but because "my mum had indicated she didn't want a slow painful death, and I did not want that either".
The Crown alleged Martin had refused help to care for her mother, as she wanted to be alone to administer the morphine.
The defence said Martin was stressed, under "intolerable pressure" and exhausted because of a lack of back-up, and that her book could not be relied on for evidence.
That is where the Hospice comes in. They were simply incredible in their support, completely available in the middle of the night, and totally understanding and ready to increase the morphine levels when Dad became more uncomfortable. During the worst time of my life, the Hospice service made Dad's death as comfortable, and dignified, as it could have been.
The implication that the Hospice were unresponsive and left Lesley Martin isolated must break the staff's hearts. I do not pretend to know all the specifics of the Martin situation - but can see clear similarities with the one I recently faced. The Hospice made it possible for us to take Dad home, and allow him to pass on in his own bed in peace. My family and I can only imagine Dad in particular, are all so grateful to the Hospice. It is hard to believe that they would be remiss and unresponsive given our experience.
There are ways of doing things properly, within the law and involving all the people that should be involved when making such a decision - and that is where I take issue with the actions and subsequent statements of Lesley Martin.
Perhaps if you take a little less that might help...
There is a good and long overdue article in the SST emphasising that a earned dollar is worth less under Labour. This article is bound to cause a lot of discussion, and so it should. Steve 'let me create the problem and tinker to fix it' Maharey's response did more to outline the problem than it did put forward a solution;
Maharey said a start had been made to improve the lot of families but "no one is saying we are finished yet in terms of trying to transfer the prosperity of the country into the pockets of middle-income families like this".Who exactly are the current holders of this so called 'prosperity' that can be so readily 'transfered'? His answer I imagine would be 'the rich' - i.e. those in the upper tax bracket No Right Turn might say? That is a poultry $5,000 more than this battling family is currently earning.
Let's say that Mr Gilbert's income raised to $65,000 and he had a student loan. Many would consider him to be well off, clearly they are not currently, so how much difference would that extra $10,000 make? I estimate about $6,000 in the bank. My point is that of his last $5,000 of income, what does he get? 51% of it (and he get's to pay more for a few social services on account of this new found 'wealth'). $65,000 per annum does not make a family rich - they should not be taxed as if they are. Labour once set a limit for the number of people in the top tax bracket, it is now more than double the number they stipulated.
Steve, stop playing monopoly with our cash, give the social engineering a break, and just leave a little more in our pockets. Does everyone being equally poor represent social justice? More to follow...
Saturday, May 01, 2004
Confessions of a blog addict...
Thursday, April 29, 2004
Jonathan Marshall loses appeal
The ex Queer Nation presenter has lost his case against Livingstone Productions - good job. He was seeking $40000 for lost wages and $10000 for humiliation - spot the irony. A low life willing to make up and publish anything about anyone was trying to have his former employer up on grounds of humiliation!
He was obviously quite upset though, going to ground and hiding under a rock after his sacking - yeah right.
Wednesday, April 28, 2004
There is no honour in abstaining
My Right suspects that the Labour party thinkers are still trying to find a way to get Tariana Turia and Nanaia Mahuta to abstain from, rather than vote against the proposed Seabed and Foreshore legislation - to save face and to save a by election. But with statements like the one below - is there any room for that? I have said before, that disagree with her as much as I might, if she falls on her sword I will certainly respect her for that.
There will be much wailing and nashing of teeth here if they 'politic' there way out of a stand so staunch;
"I have heard the consistent call in my electorate – from Tirau to Tawa - to oppose the Bill and put forward their views to my colleagues. I have advised the Prime Minister, as directed by my constituency, of the clear opposition to the Bill from the people of Te Tai Hauauru.
I believe that in putting forward this view, I have done nothing wrong. However I do accept the doctrine of collective Cabinet responsibility.
The caucus has today given me and Nanaia Mahuta leave not to support the legislation. I appreciate the respect the Prime Minister has shown us, and the sincere efforts she and senior Ministers have made to accommodate the diverse opinions within the caucus."
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
Going, going
Tariana Turia is all but out of the Labour Party, if this mornings actions are anything to go by. Storming out of an all day caucus is clearly a sign that things are bad - especially considering she was the star attraction.
A spokesman for Associate Maori Affairs Minister Tariana Turia said his minister, who walked out of an all day caucus at Premiere House earlier today, is not expected to make any further comment on her position in the Labour Party today.More to follow - but a by election will keep things interesting for a while at least. God only knows what she could spout given free licence - frightening.
The Prime Minister is presently holding a press conference concerning Ms Turia.
Monday, April 26, 2004
Ding ding ding
Peter Dunce and Winston Peters are having a go! Great stuff, Peter was upset at Winston making the fairly obvious and accurate observation that it was a bloody television gimmick (the 'worm') that has given him more than one other playmate in Parliament. Peters also called Peter a lap dog - hardly a vicious attack by Winnie's standards.
So it was mildly amusing to read Peter Dunne's rather limp response (via Press Release):
"In his customary incoherent manner, Mr Peter has responded with a tirade of abuse, calling me a lapdog and making obscure remarks about worms and dogs," said Mr Dunne.Apparently you can still refer to past 'incidents' when 'off duty' (but is a Parliamentarian ever?) from the lofty ground that Peter likes to speak down from.
"In the interests of conducting the politics of fact and not abuse, let me remind the country that during Mr Peters' disastrous rule as Treasurer and deputy Prime Minister, he
* had to sack one of his own party's ministers for refusing to follow the rules
* led an unprecedented walkout from a Cabinet meeting
* was himself sacked by his own party's Maori MP's because they had no faith in his leadership
* and spent millions of dollars of taxpayer money on a referendum on superannuation which turned into a referendum on his own performance. The final vote 93% v 7% - was a resounding defeat for Mr Peters and his policies.
Mr Peters has also developed a reputation for getting involved in late-night brawls in Courtenay Place scarcely the mark of a man who claims he wishes to do nothing but good for the people of New Zealand.
Peter - I for one look forward to you being on your lonesome after the next election, but even more than that, I look forward to Winston having you for lunch until then. It's called charisma, and in this battle I believe that wit (and sound bites) will win the day. A press release has never been read on the 6 o'clock news to my knowledge and that is where this battle will be won or lost.
Sunday, April 25, 2004
Gremlins - me thinks so
Those recent visitors may have noticed a few 'technical issues' have taken hold, others may simply find themselves thinking that My Right is making more sense than usual.
Normal service, and blogging should resume very soon.
Thursday, April 22, 2004
Lying tart
Struth Dyson has been caught out again, she may be one of the sister-hood, but you do wonder how long it will be before Helen has had enough. The current trouble is that her swarmy, pleased with herself, there's no issue here answers about the stressed out souls at ACC were bollocks.
Not only had the National Union of Public Employees raised its concerns with Ms Dyson, it had received a response from the minister. He said Miss Clark had promised to set new standards of openness, transparency and honesty but standards had never been so low.She lied, she got found out - and not for the first time;
She was also indirectly criticised three years ago when chief Employment Court judge Tom Goddard rejected her evidence of a meeting at which Social Services Minister Steve Maharey swore and criticised the way former Work and Income boss Christine Rankin dressed.Now over to you Helen - I would love to see she of smug face rightly (back) benched again...
Justice Goddard said he preferred the evidence of Ms Rankin's witness. "There is definitely a pattern where, at the very least, you can say Ms Dyson is economical with the truth," Mr Carter said yesterday.
Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Gagging for civil war
Career activist and representative of himself has sent the Army packing from a beach near Wanganui. Apart from a fairly grandiose way of describing the fact that he kicked up a stink and the Queens Army wasn't in the mood for a race based incident - there is bugger all to the story. Other than to say that this sort of thing makes My Right's pale dome glow crimson (and knowing Second Lieutenant Nick Hodge - the Queens rep must have told him to back off very early in the piece).
This weeks prize for the least useful contribution to a delicate debate goes to Ken (night) Mair:
"We've taken a clear stance. We see it (the Government's plans) as straight theft and confiscation and we'll defend our lands as we see fit.".
Monday's events had been amicable, he said. He contacted the exercise's organiser, Second Lieutenant Nick Hodge, who said he understood the group's concerns and would move the exercise to another location.
Ken Mair does his bit for intolerance